RCP: 0.7.8, CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent element in the corpora view
Currently the internal results of CA, CAH, Specificities, Lexical Table parent are the not real ones.
The Specificities parent is a lexical table
The CA parent is a lexical table
The CAH parent is a CA (with current factomineR usage)
The Lexical Table parent is a partition Or an Index computed with a partition
This will ease the link of results for instance between a CA and a specificities computed with the same lexical table
Note: intermediate parents are now hidden in the corpora view
(from redmine: issue id 1856, created on 2016/09/13 by Matthieu Decorde)
Activity
added Commands type::feature + 1 deleted label
changed milestone to %TXM 0.8.4
Serge Heiden a écrit :
Technically speaking and from a usage point of view, a CAH is not a descendant of a CA (in the FactomineR case, the CA is a helper to calculate the CAH) ->the CAH et CA should both be sibling descendants of a lexical table.
As far as I know, with the FactomineR process we use, The CAH is computed on the coordinates of the points in a sub-space of the factorial space (the 5 first dimensions by default, or less if necessary). So CAH directly uses a result of CA : with the current implementation, CAH is a child of CA (even if in the general case, CAH could actually be computed on the lexical table and then be a brother of CA).
(from redmine: written on 2016/10/06 by Benedicte Pincemin)
added tool::specificities label
changed milestone to %TXM 0.8.2
